election-methods@mailman.electorama.com

Technical discussion of election methods

View all threads

Re: [EM] POLL: Approaching deadline: 2024-05-11 05:15:00 UTC

RB
robert bristow-johnson
Sat, May 11, 2024 1:07 AM

Okay, here is my ballot.  With Write-In candidates.1. Condorcet-Plurality 2. MinMax3. Ranked-Pairs4. Schulze5. BTR-IRV======== Approval cutoff point6. all other Condorcet-consistent methodsN: Hare IRVN+1: ApprovalN+2: STARN+3: FPTPN+4: ScoreI am mostly agnostic about WV vs. Margins for defeat strength but I sorta resonate more with margins. My principal motivation are methods that are good (so it has to be Condorcet) and might have the best chance for adoption in legislation for public elections to government office.Powered by Cricket Wireless------ Original message------From: Michael OssipoffDate: Fri, May 10, 2024 20:11To: Kristofer Munsterhjelm;Cc: EM;robert bristow-johnson;Subject:Re: [EM] POLL: Approaching deadline: 2024-05-11 05:15:00 UTCBut we’ve all posted our ballots, & so, if someone wanted to strategally take advantage of the information about the other ballots, they’ve already got that information anyway.So there doesn’t seem to be a need to conceal our ballots fr
om eachother to prevent strategic use of them. … because that information is already out.So why not just say that a person’s most recent posted ballot (which could be what that person has already posted) before the deadline,  counts as that person’s ballot.If people feel that there hasn’t been enough close-notice about the deadline, should we advance the deadline by 2 days?On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 14:41 Kristofer Munsterhjelm km_elmet@t-online.de wrote:On 2024-05-10 23:37, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:

On 2024-05-10 22:34, robert bristow-johnson wrote:

I hadn't known that we were actually voting.  I don't need to vote by
secret ballot, but I don't want to necessarily influence other votes.

Should I just send a ballot to you, Kristofer?  How do we do this?

I think this is the easiest way to do it:

Send your ballot to me, Michael Ossipoff, or both. Then post it to the
list once the deadline is up. I'll verify that you sent it to me before
the deadline. (And I imagine Michael would do the same if you sent the
ballot to him.)

I forgot to say: if you change your mind after having sent your ballot,
just send your modified ballot later. As long as it's inside the
deadline, the last one you submitted is the one that counts.

-km

Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list info

Okay, here is my ballot.  With Write-In candidates.1. Condorcet-Plurality 2. MinMax3. Ranked-Pairs4. Schulze5. BTR-IRV======== Approval cutoff point6. all other Condorcet-consistent methodsN: Hare IRVN+1: ApprovalN+2: STARN+3: FPTPN+4: ScoreI am mostly agnostic about WV vs. Margins for defeat strength but I sorta resonate more with margins. My principal motivation are methods that are good (so it has to be Condorcet) and might have the best chance for adoption in legislation for public elections to government office.Powered by Cricket Wireless------ Original message------From: Michael OssipoffDate: Fri, May 10, 2024 20:11To: Kristofer Munsterhjelm;Cc: EM;robert bristow-johnson;Subject:Re: [EM] POLL: Approaching deadline: 2024-05-11 05:15:00 UTCBut we’ve all posted our ballots, & so, if someone wanted to strategally take advantage of the information about the other ballots, they’ve already got that information anyway.So there doesn’t seem to be a need to conceal our ballots fr om eachother to prevent strategic use of them. … because that information is already out.So why not just say that a person’s most recent posted ballot (which could be what that person has already posted) before the deadline,  counts as that person’s ballot.If people feel that there hasn’t been enough close-notice about the deadline, should we advance the deadline by 2 days?On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 14:41 Kristofer Munsterhjelm <km_elmet@t-online.de> wrote:On 2024-05-10 23:37, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote: > On 2024-05-10 22:34, robert bristow-johnson wrote: >> >> I hadn't known that we were actually voting.  I don't need to vote by >> secret ballot, but I don't want to necessarily influence other votes. >> >> Should I just send a ballot to you, Kristofer?  How do we do this? > > I think this is the easiest way to do it: > > Send your ballot to me, Michael Ossipoff, or both. Then post it to the > list once the deadline is up. I'll verify that you sent it to me before > the deadline. (And I imagine Michael would do the same if you sent the > ballot to him.) I forgot to say: if you change your mind after having sent your ballot, just send your modified ballot later. As long as it's inside the deadline, the last one you submitted is the one that counts. -km ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list info
CB
Chris Benham
Sat, May 11, 2024 9:22 AM

Robert,

I am mostly agnostic about WV vs. Margins for defeat strength but I
sorta resonate more with margins.

No Margins method was nominated, which is presumably why no-one bothered
to compare it with Winning Votes. If a lot of voters truncate (which
they have a perfect right to) Margins becomes completely absurd.

A method  I didn't think to nominate in time (but probably would if we
did this again) is  Condorcet//Hare.   It is a possible
political-compromise kludge that is much better than
Condorcet//Plurality, Margins, and STAR.

You really hate Score that much?

Chris

On 11/05/2024 10:37 am, robert bristow-johnson wrote:

Okay, here is my ballot.  With Write-In candidates.

  1. Condorcet-Plurality
  2. MinMax
  3. Ranked-Pairs
  4. Schulze
  5. BTR-IRV

======== Approval cutoff point

  1. all other Condorcet-consistent methods

N: Hare IRV
N+1: Approval
N+2: STAR
N+3: FPTP
N+4: Score

I am mostly agnostic about WV vs. Margins for defeat strength but I
sorta resonate more with margins. My principal motivation are methods
that are good (so it has to be Condorcet) and might have the best
chance for adoption in legislation for public elections to government
office.

/Powered by Cricket Wireless/

------ Original message------
*From: *Michael Ossipoff
*Date: *Fri, May 10, 2024 20:11
*To: *Kristofer Munsterhjelm;
*Cc: *EM;robert bristow-johnson;
*Subject:*Re: [EM] POLL: Approaching deadline: 2024-05-11 05
<tel:2024-05-11 05>:15:00 UTC

But we’ve all posted our ballots, & so, if someone wanted to
strategally take advantage of the information about the other ballots,
they’ve already got that information anyway.

So there doesn’t seem to be a need to conceal our ballots from
eachother to prevent strategic use of them. … because that information
is already out.

So why not just say that a person’s most recent posted ballot (which
could be what that person has already posted) before the deadline,
 counts as that person’s ballot.

If people feel that there hasn’t been enough close-notice about the
deadline, should we advance the deadline by 2 days?

On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 14:41 Kristofer Munsterhjelm
km_elmet@t-online.de wrote:

 On 2024-05-10 23 <tel:2024-05-10 23>:37, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:

On 2024-05-10 22 <tel:2024-05-10 22>:34, robert bristow-johnson

 wrote:

I hadn't known that we were actually voting.  I don't need to

 vote by

secret ballot, but I don't want to necessarily influence other

 votes.

Should I just send a ballot to you, Kristofer? How do we do this?

I think this is the easiest way to do it:

Send your ballot to me, Michael Ossipoff, or both. Then post it

 to the

list once the deadline is up. I'll verify that you sent it to me

 before

the deadline. (And I imagine Michael would do the same if you

 sent the

ballot to him.)

 I forgot to say: if you change your mind after having sent your
 ballot,
 just send your modified ballot later. As long as it's inside the
 deadline, the last one you submitted is the one that counts.

 -km
 ----
 Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for
 list info

Election-Methods mailing list - seehttps://electorama.com/em  for list info

Robert, > > I am mostly agnostic about WV vs. Margins for defeat strength but I > sorta resonate more with margins. No Margins method was nominated, which is presumably why no-one bothered to compare it with Winning Votes. If a lot of voters truncate (which they have a perfect right to) Margins becomes completely absurd. A method  I didn't think to nominate in time (but probably would if we did this again) is  Condorcet//Hare.   It is a possible political-compromise kludge that is much better than Condorcet//Plurality, Margins, and STAR. You really hate Score that much? Chris On 11/05/2024 10:37 am, robert bristow-johnson wrote: > Okay, here is my ballot.  With Write-In candidates. > > 1. Condorcet-Plurality > 2. MinMax > 3. Ranked-Pairs > 4. Schulze > 5. BTR-IRV > > ======== Approval cutoff point > > 6. all other Condorcet-consistent methods > > N: Hare IRV > N+1: Approval > N+2: STAR > N+3: FPTP > N+4: Score > > I am mostly agnostic about WV vs. Margins for defeat strength but I > sorta resonate more with margins. My principal motivation are methods > that are good (so it has to be Condorcet) and might have the best > chance for adoption in legislation for public elections to government > office. > > > /Powered by Cricket Wireless/ > > ------ Original message------ > *From: *Michael Ossipoff > *Date: *Fri, May 10, 2024 20:11 > *To: *Kristofer Munsterhjelm; > *Cc: *EM;robert bristow-johnson; > *Subject:*Re: [EM] POLL: Approaching deadline: 2024-05-11 05 > <tel:2024-05-11 05>:15:00 UTC > > But we’ve all posted our ballots, & so, if someone wanted to > strategally take advantage of the information about the other ballots, > they’ve already got that information anyway. > > So there doesn’t seem to be a need to conceal our ballots from > eachother to prevent strategic use of them. … because that information > is already out. > > So why not just say that a person’s most recent posted ballot (which > could be what that person has already posted) before the deadline, >  counts as that person’s ballot. > > If people feel that there hasn’t been enough close-notice about the > deadline, should we advance the deadline by 2 days? > > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 14:41 Kristofer Munsterhjelm > <km_elmet@t-online.de> wrote: > > On 2024-05-10 23 <tel:2024-05-10 23>:37, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote: > > On 2024-05-10 22 <tel:2024-05-10 22>:34, robert bristow-johnson > wrote: > >> > >> I hadn't known that we were actually voting.  I don't need to > vote by > >> secret ballot, but I don't want to necessarily influence other > votes. > >> > >> Should I just send a ballot to you, Kristofer? How do we do this? > > > > I think this is the easiest way to do it: > > > > Send your ballot to me, Michael Ossipoff, or both. Then post it > to the > > list once the deadline is up. I'll verify that you sent it to me > before > > the deadline. (And I imagine Michael would do the same if you > sent the > > ballot to him.) > > I forgot to say: if you change your mind after having sent your > ballot, > just send your modified ballot later. As long as it's inside the > deadline, the last one you submitted is the one that counts. > > -km > ---- > Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for > list info > > > ---- > Election-Methods mailing list - seehttps://electorama.com/em for list info