Hi folks, There are two new articles on electowiki that may not make sense to those of you who are are intimately familiar with election-methods jargon: "aggregate method": https://electowiki.org/wiki/Aggregate_method "completion method" https://electowiki.org/wiki/Completion_method An "aggregate method" is jargon I made up to describe the methods that we've been describing all along on this mailing list (e.g. the "Smith//Condorcet" method was popular on the EM list[1]). [1]: http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/1996-August/065995.html What I mean by "aggregate method" is a method where a series of methods (Copeland, Smith, etc) are chained together. Then the "winner" (or "winners") pop out at the end of the chain. What I mean by "completion method" is the method at the end of the chain in an "aggregate method". Am I using those terms the way that people who make a living researching/studying this stuff use those terms? I don't want to redefine terms, but if no one agrees on what "completion method" means (or has a really sloppy definition of it, or just uses the term without knowing what it means to sound smart), then I don't feel bad about redefining the term. Regardless, I would really appreciate some help coming up with good definitions. Thanks Rob