Had you not already? Good to have you back :-)
On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 11:02 PM Michael Ossipoff email9648742@gmail.com
wrote:
Blocking that Dunning-Kruger ctackpot.
On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 7:56 PM Michael Garman <
michael.garman@rankthevote.us> wrote:
Where did I say “eliminate”? The only use of that word I can find in my
archives is me saying FV updated its messaging guidance from “eliminate” to
“reduce.”
Nice to see that even though you’ve taken to advocating for RCV (as
you’ll now willingly call it), you haven’t lost your passion for unhinged
screeds :-)
On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 10:49 PM Michael Ossipoff email9648742@gmail.com
wrote:
Incorrect. Michael Garman is misrepresenting what I said.
I advocated for RCV for a long time on EM & everywhere else too.
What I criticized about Garman was his false claim that RCV eliminates
the spoiler-problem.
Wrong. It “only” eliminates the spoiler-problem for members of the
Mutual-Majority. …but that’s good enough. Not many methods do so.
Approval, Score & star don’t do so for anyone.
Could one ask for more? Well RP(wv) & MinMax(wv) effectively pretty-much
do so everyone.
…at the unacceptable cost of fast becoming unhandcountable with more
than a few candidates…with the consequent greater count-fraud problem. As I
said: Unacceptable.
Garman’s falsehood was (& still is?) discrediting RCV.
Michael Ossipoff
On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 7:51 AM Michael Garman <
michael.garman@rankthevote.us> wrote:
I'd be curious to learn why he changed his mind. He was nothing short
of hostile to anyone who suggested it was even a minor improvement from FPP
while he was on this list.
On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 10:42 AM Markus Schulze via Election-Methods <
election-methods@lists.electorama.com> wrote:
After 30 years, Mike Ossipoff had a change of hearts and now promotes
instant-runoff voting:
Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for
list info