---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Michael Garman michael.garman@rankthevote.us
Date: Mon, May 13, 2024 at 12:35 AM
Subject: Fwd: Ballot
To: Kristofer Munsterhjelm km_elmet@t-online.de
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Michael Garman michael.garman@rankthevote.us
Date: Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:10 AM
Subject: Ballot
To: EM list election-methods@electorama.com
Since the question of the poll is on suitability for use in public
elections:
- IRV
- STAR
- Approval with separate runoff
- Approval
- All nominees not listed above or below
- Plurality
I approve through the 3rd-ranked alternative, inclusive.
For the record, I would probably rank IRV about ninth out of all the
nominees in theory, but the vast majority are too complicated or
politically infeasible for use in public elections.
I reserve the right to alter this ballot at any time prior to the close of
the poll.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Michael Garman <michael.garman@rankthevote.us>
Date: Mon, May 13, 2024 at 12:35 AM
Subject: Fwd: Ballot
To: Kristofer Munsterhjelm <km_elmet@t-online.de>
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Michael Garman <michael.garman@rankthevote.us>
Date: Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:10 AM
Subject: Ballot
To: EM list <election-methods@electorama.com>
Since the question of the poll is on suitability for use in public
elections:
1. IRV
2. STAR
3. Approval with separate runoff
4. Approval
5. All nominees not listed above or below
6. Plurality
I approve through the 3rd-ranked alternative, inclusive.
For the record, I would probably rank IRV about ninth out of all the
nominees in theory, but the vast majority are too complicated or
politically infeasible for use in public elections.
I reserve the right to alter this ballot at any time prior to the close of
the poll.
