Dear Kristofer, > In other words, something like "Droop,X" won't retain the > benefit of say, "Smith,X" of being automatically monotone > whenever X is. The Borda count is monotone. But Smith//Borda violates monotonicity. Markus Schulze

On 04/02/2020 13.01, Markus Schulze wrote: > Dear Kristofer, > > >> In other words, something like "Droop,X" won't retain the >> benefit of say, "Smith,X" of being automatically monotone >> whenever X is. > > The Borda count is monotone. > > But Smith//Borda violates monotonicity. Does Smith,Borda violate monotonicity? (I.e. do Borda on the full set of candidates, then elect the Smith set member that is ranked highest according to the Borda outcome.)