Hallo, Daniel Carrera wrote (9 July 2021): > If you look at their website, they don't have > any unfair attacks against other methods. Here are my complaints: 1. The websites falsely claim that an election method is immune to spoilers if and only if it is guaranteed that adding a ballot and the reversed ballot always cancel each other out. 2. The websites falsely claim that the legal definition for equal voting says that adding a ballot and the reversed ballot must always cancel each other out. 3. The websites falsely claim that Arrow's Theorem and the Gibbard-Satterthwaite Theorem say that no preferential election method can guarantee that adding a ballot and the reversed ballot always cancel each other out. Markus Schulze