A few days ago, I happened upon this page:
http://www.anishathalye.com/2015/03/07/designing-a-better-judging-system/
which seems to describe a pairwise method that's based on maximizing the
MLE of a model where a voter samples some preference for X and for Y on
two Gaussians (with unknown means) and votes X>Y if his sample for X is
greater than his sample for Y.
Is this Condorcet? It might well be (because of the Condorcet jury
theorem). In any case, it's an interesting approach, and reminds me of
Peter Zbornik asking some years ago if it'd be possible to model voter
decisions as uncertain on some statistical basis and take that into account.
The system, Binomial STV, which Kristofer once asked me to show how it
works, with his example, is a statistical count, as the name, binomial
implies.
Binomial Transferable Voting (BTV) is a generalisation from conventional
STV, which is zero order BTV, which I support, because it is essentially
the right method, unlike the legion of other official systems.
BTV is not a Condorcet pairing system.
from Richard Lung.
On 20/02/2017 16:13, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
A few days ago, I happened upon this page:
http://www.anishathalye.com/2015/03/07/designing-a-better-judging-system/
which seems to describe a pairwise method that's based on maximizing the
MLE of a model where a voter samples some preference for X and for Y on
two Gaussians (with unknown means) and votes X>Y if his sample for X is
greater than his sample for Y.
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
--
Richard Lung.
http://www.voting.ukscientists.com
Democracy Science series 3 free e-books in pdf:
https://plus.google.com/106191200795605365085
E-books in epub format:
https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/democracyscience