*1.* Every participant gets X points. *2. *Every participant can create proposals. *3.* Every proposal needs to have an "implementation plan" attached -> someone or some people and resources to realize the proposal gets executed. *4. *Everyone can vote on proposals by voting with 0-X points. *5. *The people responsible for realizing the proposal can accept the proposal at any time. *6. *Once a proposal is accepted by "executors", all points that have been voted are removed from voters into a pool, the total vote amount Z and then re-distributed equally to every participant, so every participant received ( Z / (amount of participants) ) votes. *7.* After "executors" finish the implementation, every participant, even the executors themselve, pay ( Z / (amount of participants) ) votes to the executors. Does something that sounds similar as what i describe above exist already? Does it have some obvious flaws that make or could make it "unfair"? -- *DISCLAIMER:* *Everything I have written above is my personal experience/opinion on things, no matter what kinds of words i did use(e.g. "always", "never", "impossible", "waste of time", ....).* *Such extreme words only do indicate, that my experience/opinion on something is very strong and i currently cannot imagine that there are other possibilities until new arguments/insights/whatever open my eyes that there are alternative perspectives too :-)Please do not feel discouraged to challenge my opinion if you have a different one.* *Best Regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen* *********************************************** Alexander Praetorius *[mail] *citizen@serapath.de <alexander.praetorius@serapath.de> *[twitter] *http://twitter.com/serapath *[github] *http://github.com/serapath ***********************************************