---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Michael Ossipoff <email9648742@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 22:16 Subject: Re: [EM] Poll on voting-systems, to inform voters in upcoming enactment-elections To: Kristofer Munsterhjelm <km_elmet@t-online.de> My ballot for the poll: Ranking: 1. Approval 2. STAR 3. Approval with separate runoff 4. Condorcet-IRV 5. RP(wv) 6. MinMax(wv) 7. Schulze 8. Everything not listed above or below 9. Majority-Judgment 10. IRV I don’t know what merits or advantages are claimed for the 8th-place alternatives. Shouldn’t vote on what I don’t know. Approval-set: Same alternatives I ranked Maybe most just want ranking, but I express an approval-set because I like what maximizes the number of people who like the outcome.

For the Approval-set, I meant: Same as what I ranked, but not IRV or Majority-Judgment On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 22:16 Michael Ossipoff <email9648742@gmail.com> wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Michael Ossipoff <email9648742@gmail.com> > Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 22:16 > Subject: Re: [EM] Poll on voting-systems, to inform voters in upcoming > enactment-elections > To: Kristofer Munsterhjelm <km_elmet@t-online.de> > > > > My ballot for the poll: > > Ranking: > > 1. Approval > 2. STAR > 3. Approval with separate runoff > 4. Condorcet-IRV > 5. RP(wv) > 6. MinMax(wv) > 7. Schulze > 8. Everything not listed above or below > 9. Majority-Judgment > 10. IRV > > I don’t know what merits or advantages are claimed for the 8th-place > alternatives. Shouldn’t vote on what I don’t know. > > Approval-set: > > Same alternatives I ranked > > Maybe most just want ranking, but I express an approval-set because I like > what maximizes the number of people who like the outcome. >

Well, actually, because my bottom-ranked alternatives aren’t going to win anyway, I’ll just approve down to, & including, my 7th-ranked alternative. On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 22:19 Michael Ossipoff <email9648742@gmail.com> wrote: > > For the Approval-set, I meant: > > Same as what I ranked, but not IRV or Majority-Judgment > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 22:16 Michael Ossipoff <email9648742@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: Michael Ossipoff <email9648742@gmail.com> >> Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 22:16 >> Subject: Re: [EM] Poll on voting-systems, to inform voters in upcoming >> enactment-elections >> To: Kristofer Munsterhjelm <km_elmet@t-online.de> >> >> >> >> My ballot for the poll: >> >> Ranking: >> >> 1. Approval >> 2. STAR >> 3. Approval with separate runoff >> 4. Condorcet-IRV >> 5. RP(wv) >> 6. MinMax(wv) >> 7. Schulze >> 8. Everything not listed above or below >> 9. Majority-Judgment >> 10. IRV >> >> I don’t know what merits or advantages are claimed for the 8th-place >> alternatives. Shouldn’t vote on what I don’t know. >> >> Approval-set: >> >> Same alternatives I ranked >> >> Maybe most just want ranking, but I express an approval-set because I >> like what maximizes the number of people who like the outcome. >> >