Sorry, in the statement that I was referring to, FairVote didn’t say that
Condorcet has a spoiler-problem. They instead said that it isn’t proven
that Condorcet doesn’t have a spoiler-problem.
…& it’s proven that IRV doesn’t have a spoiler problem?
Oops!!! FairVote forgot to share the proof with us, or tell us where it’s
published.
Obviously, & surely Richie knows this, in Condorcet you can fully vote for
Favorite over Good, & for Good over Worst. … but not in Successive
Topcount Elimination (STE).
What is it called when someone intentionally deceives?
Sorry, in the statement that I was referring to, FairVote didn’t say that
Condorcet has a spoiler-problem. They instead said that it isn’t proven
that Condorcet *doesn’t* have a spoiler-problem.
…& it’s proven that IRV doesn’t have a spoiler problem?
Oops!!! FairVote forgot to share the proof with us, or tell us where it’s
published.
Obviously, & surely Richie knows this, in Condorcet you can fully vote for
Favorite over Good, & for Good over Worst. … but not in Successive
Topcount Elimination (STE).
What is it called when someone intentionally deceives?