election-methods@mailman.electorama.com

Technical discussion of election methods

View all threads

Oops (re resistant set extension)

KM
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Wed, Dec 20, 2023 9:51 PM

I missed an obvious counterexample for the first preference-based extension.

34: A>B>C
33: B>C>A
33: C>A>B

Now (A,B) ~> C since 34 + 33 > 50,
{B, C} ~> A since 33 + 33 > 50
and {C, A} ~> B since 33 + 34 > 50

hence a cycle.

So that relation (with that threshold) is unsuitable. If the first
preference extension is to be salvaged, the threshold can't be 1/(k-|S|+1).

-km

I missed an obvious counterexample for the first preference-based extension. 34: A>B>C 33: B>C>A 33: C>A>B Now (A,B) ~> C since 34 + 33 > 50, {B, C} ~> A since 33 + 33 > 50 and {C, A} ~> B since 33 + 34 > 50 hence a cycle. So that relation (with that threshold) is unsuitable. If the first preference extension is to be salvaged, the threshold can't be 1/(k-|S|+1). -km