From "Michael Garman" michael.garman@rankthevote.us

Since the question of the poll is on suitability for use in public
elections:

1. IRV
2. STAR
3. Approval with separate runoff
4. Approval
5. All nominees not listed above or below
6. Plurality

I approve through the 3rd-ranked alternative, inclusive.

For the record, I would probably rank IRV about ninth out of all the
nominees in theory, but the vast majority are too complicated or
politically infeasible for use in public elections.

I reserve the right to alter this ballot at any time prior to the close
of the poll.

------ Original Message ------
From "Michael Garman" michael.garman@rankthevote.us
To "EM list" election-methods@electorama.com
Date 4/18/2024 2:10:06 AM
Subject [EM] Ballot

Since the question of the poll is on suitability for use in public
elections:

I don't think the question of the poll has been formally stated. For me,
this means that no one can answer it yet. In any event, very little of the
discussion of each method, pro and con, has been about "suitability for use
in public elections".

--Bob Richard

1. IRV
2. STAR
3. Approval with separate runoff
4. Approval
5. All nominees not listed above or below
6. Plurality

I approve through the 3rd-ranked alternative, inclusive.

For the record, I would probably rank IRV about ninth out of all the
nominees in theory, but the vast majority are too complicated or
politically infeasible for use in public elections.

I reserve the right to alter this ballot at any time prior to the close of
the poll.

Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list
info