election-methods@mailman.electorama.com

Technical discussion of election methods

View all threads

PROPORTIONAL REPERSENTATION (PR) OHIO

DH
Don Hoffard
Tue, May 28, 2019 1:29 AM

PROPORTIONAL REPERSENTATION (PR) OHIO: Ohio has 16 Representatives to
Congress. In the last election (2018) they elected 12 Republicans and 4
Democrats.  The state has been accrued of Gerrymandering and the issue is
now before the US Supreme Court. I added all of the votes of all 16
congressional districts and found that the Republican got 52% and Democrats
got 48% (just between the two main parties). A fair representation of the
voters of Ohio would be 8 Republicans and 8 Democrats (52%/48% *16 = rounded
to 8/8) based on the votes cast in the last election.  Was the cause
Gerrymandering? Let us do a fair redistricting of the state so that each
district reflects the state as a whole (52%R/48%D) (Not really possible,
however) and had a new election. The result would 16 Republicans and 0
Democrats, where the Republicans would win every districts (52%/48%) with no
Gerrymandering. The real problem in Ohio (and in most states) is the "Winner
take all" single district system.

PROPORTIONAL REPERSENTATION (PR): To do PR you need a ranked list of
candidates by party (top to bottom) and a percent voting for each party at
the state level (say 52%R/48%D). For Ohio we would pick the top 8 on the
Democrats list and the top 8 on the Republicans list and they would be
Ohio's representatives to Congress. Traditionally there would be no
districts and the party rankings are done at the state level (all state
party members vote on the rankings). A party member would vote for 1 (or
alternatively vote for 16). Ok, this is where I have a problem with this
method.  It would be hard for any Republican (or Democrat) voter to know, or
even how to rank 16 state wide candidates. Secondly, more of the higher
ranked candidates could come from the cities and would not truly represent
some the rural areas of the state. Lastly, a person in Ohio could not tell
who is representing them in Congress.

ALTERNATIVE (PR):  Let us keep the congressional districts (16).  We will
then have each district vote by party preference ('which party do you
prefer"). Some district may have 67% to 33% republican preference votes,
while others districts may have 80% to 28% democratic preference votes. We
add the party preference votes of each district to get a state level
preference vote total.  Let us assume that it is about (52%R/48%D).  We
would use this to determine the states "preferred" proportion of
representatives to Congress (8R/8D). Now in the primary each party would
vote for their candidate to represent them in each of the 16 districts (the
same as current). The Republican candidates in each district with their top
8 percent's (%) preference votes would be elected to Congress. The
Democratic candidate in each district with their top 8 percent's (%)
preference votes would also be elected to Congress.

Don Hoffard

Aloha, Oregon

PROPORTIONAL REPERSENTATION (PR) OHIO: Ohio has 16 Representatives to Congress. In the last election (2018) they elected 12 Republicans and 4 Democrats. The state has been accrued of Gerrymandering and the issue is now before the US Supreme Court. I added all of the votes of all 16 congressional districts and found that the Republican got 52% and Democrats got 48% (just between the two main parties). A fair representation of the voters of Ohio would be 8 Republicans and 8 Democrats (52%/48% *16 = rounded to 8/8) based on the votes cast in the last election. Was the cause Gerrymandering? Let us do a fair redistricting of the state so that each district reflects the state as a whole (52%R/48%D) (Not really possible, however) and had a new election. The result would 16 Republicans and 0 Democrats, where the Republicans would win every districts (52%/48%) with no Gerrymandering. The real problem in Ohio (and in most states) is the "Winner take all" single district system. PROPORTIONAL REPERSENTATION (PR): To do PR you need a ranked list of candidates by party (top to bottom) and a percent voting for each party at the state level (say 52%R/48%D). For Ohio we would pick the top 8 on the Democrats list and the top 8 on the Republicans list and they would be Ohio's representatives to Congress. Traditionally there would be no districts and the party rankings are done at the state level (all state party members vote on the rankings). A party member would vote for 1 (or alternatively vote for 16). Ok, this is where I have a problem with this method. It would be hard for any Republican (or Democrat) voter to know, or even how to rank 16 state wide candidates. Secondly, more of the higher ranked candidates could come from the cities and would not truly represent some the rural areas of the state. Lastly, a person in Ohio could not tell who is representing them in Congress. ALTERNATIVE (PR): Let us keep the congressional districts (16). We will then have each district vote by party preference ('which party do you prefer"). Some district may have 67% to 33% republican preference votes, while others districts may have 80% to 28% democratic preference votes. We add the party preference votes of each district to get a state level preference vote total. Let us assume that it is about (52%R/48%D). We would use this to determine the states "preferred" proportion of representatives to Congress (8R/8D). Now in the primary each party would vote for their candidate to represent them in each of the 16 districts (the same as current). The Republican candidates in each district with their top 8 percent's (%) preference votes would be elected to Congress. The Democratic candidate in each district with their top 8 percent's (%) preference votes would also be elected to Congress. Don Hoffard Aloha, Oregon
RL
Richard Lung
Tue, May 28, 2019 2:15 PM

Recommend the Cambridge PR local elections method. I believe it is
possible to download their computer count. Last I heard, it relied on
statistical probability for valid surplus transfer of votes in order of
preference. A best Gregory method transfer, or the Meek method STV would
be better still (tho not perfect).
But all of them are voter-centered preferential PR methods, which is
democratically far preferable to party-centered PR, where only party
members would get to rank the party lists, with no cross-party
preferences allowed.
No official party list system, in the world, that I know of, allows the
voters a preference vote at all, in which respect these proposals, as I
understand (or misunderstand) them, would only so allow party members
(by definition imprisoned within their party for preference).

from
Richard Lung.

On 28/05/2019 02:29, Don Hoffard wrote:

PROPORTIONAL REPERSENTATION (PR) OHIO: Ohio has 16 Representatives to
Congress. In the last election (2018) they elected 12 Republicans and
4 Democrats.  The state has been accrued of Gerrymandering and the
issue is now before the US Supreme Court. I added all of the votes of
all 16 congressional districts and found that the Republican got 52%
and Democrats got 48% (just between the two main parties). A fair
representation of the voters of Ohio would be 8 Republicans and 8
Democrats (52%/48% *16 = rounded to 8/8) based on the votes cast in
the last election.  Was the cause Gerrymandering? Let us do a fair
redistricting of the state so that each district reflects the state as
a whole (52%R/48%D) (Not really possible, however) and had a new
election. The result would 16 Republicans and 0 Democrats, where the
Republicans would win every districts (52%/48%) with no
Gerrymandering. The real problem in Ohio (and in most states) is the
“Winner take all” single district system.

PROPORTIONAL REPERSENTATION (PR): To do PR you need a ranked list of
candidates by party (top to bottom) and a percent voting for each
party at the state level (say 52%R/48%D). For Ohio we would pick the
top 8 on the Democrats list and the top 8 on the Republicans list and
they would be Ohio’s representatives to Congress. Traditionally there
would be no districts and the party rankings are done at the state
level (all state party members vote on the rankings). A party member
would vote for 1 (or alternatively vote for 16). Ok, this is where I
have a problem with this method.  It would be hard for any Republican
(or Democrat) voter to know, or even how to rank 16 state wide
candidates. Secondly, more of the higher ranked candidates could come
from the cities and would not truly represent some the rural areas of
the state. Lastly, a person in Ohio could not tell who is representing
them in Congress.

ALTERNATIVE (PR):  Let us keep the congressional districts (16).  We
will then have each district vote by party preference (‘which party do
you prefer”). Some district may have 67% to 33% republican preference
votes, while others districts may have 80% to 28% democratic
preference votes. We add the party preference votes of each district
to get a state level preference vote total.  Let us assume that it is
about (52%R/48%D).  We would use this to determine the states
“preferred” proportion of representatives to Congress (8R/8D). Now in
the primary each party would vote for their candidate to represent
them in each of the 16 districts (the same as current). The Republican
candidates in each district with their top 8 percent’s (%) preference
votes would be elected to Congress. The Democratic candidate in each
district with their top 8 percent’s (%) preference votes would also be
elected to Congress.

Don Hoffard

Aloha, Oregon


Election-Methods mailing list - seehttps://electorama.com/em  for list info

Recommend the Cambridge PR local elections method. I believe it is possible to download their computer count. Last I heard, it relied on statistical probability for valid surplus transfer of votes in order of preference. A best Gregory method transfer, or the Meek method STV would be better still (tho not perfect). But all of them are voter-centered preferential PR methods, which is democratically far preferable to party-centered PR, where only party members would get to rank the party lists, with no cross-party preferences allowed. No official party list system, in the world, that I know of, allows the voters a preference vote at all, in which respect these proposals, as I understand (or misunderstand) them, would only so allow party members (by definition imprisoned within their party for preference). from Richard Lung. On 28/05/2019 02:29, Don Hoffard wrote: > > PROPORTIONAL REPERSENTATION (PR) OHIO: Ohio has 16 Representatives to > Congress. In the last election (2018) they elected 12 Republicans and > 4 Democrats.  The state has been accrued of Gerrymandering and the > issue is now before the US Supreme Court. I added all of the votes of > all 16 congressional districts and found that the Republican got 52% > and Democrats got 48% (just between the two main parties). A fair > representation of the voters of Ohio would be 8 Republicans and 8 > Democrats (52%/48% *16 = rounded to 8/8) based on the votes cast in > the last election.  Was the cause Gerrymandering? Let us do a fair > redistricting of the state so that each district reflects the state as > a whole (52%R/48%D) (Not really possible, however) and had a new > election. The result would 16 Republicans and 0 Democrats, where the > Republicans would win every districts (52%/48%) with no > Gerrymandering. The real problem in Ohio (and in most states) is the > “Winner take all” single district system. > > PROPORTIONAL REPERSENTATION (PR): To do PR you need a ranked list of > candidates by party (top to bottom) and a percent voting for each > party at the state level (say 52%R/48%D). For Ohio we would pick the > top 8 on the Democrats list and the top 8 on the Republicans list and > they would be Ohio’s representatives to Congress. Traditionally there > would be no districts and the party rankings are done at the state > level (all state party members vote on the rankings). A party member > would vote for 1 (or alternatively vote for 16). Ok, this is where I > have a problem with this method.  It would be hard for any Republican > (or Democrat) voter to know, or even how to rank 16 state wide > candidates. Secondly, more of the higher ranked candidates could come > from the cities and would not truly represent some the rural areas of > the state. Lastly, a person in Ohio could not tell who is representing > them in Congress. > > ALTERNATIVE (PR):  Let us keep the congressional districts (16).  We > will then have each district vote by party preference (‘which party do > you prefer”). Some district may have 67% to 33% republican preference > votes, while others districts may have 80% to 28% democratic > preference votes. We add the party preference votes of each district > to get a state level preference vote total.  Let us assume that it is > about (52%R/48%D).  We would use this to determine the states > “preferred” proportion of representatives to Congress (8R/8D). Now in > the primary each party would vote for their candidate to represent > them in each of the 16 districts (the same as current). The Republican > candidates in each district with their top 8 percent’s (%) preference > votes would be elected to Congress. The Democratic candidate in each > district with their top 8 percent’s (%) preference votes would also be > elected to Congress. > > Don Hoffard > > Aloha, Oregon > > > ---- > Election-Methods mailing list - seehttps://electorama.com/em for list info